Shamar夏瑪巴披露Ole Nydahl（尼達爾喇嘛）譚崔性交修行 (附原文信：An Answer by Kunzig Shamar Rinpoche to Questions Raised about Bodhi Path and Lama Ole Nydahl, Criticism of Tantra-Teachings)

針對他人提出的一些問題，Shamar仁波切(藏傳佛教界的偉大人物，西藏人，曾在第十六世噶瑪巴過世後、第十七世噶瑪巴就任前擔任紅教的傳承人……請詳見網站www.shamarpa.com) 他（Shamar仁波切）做出了以下的答覆：

Ole喇嘛[23]在六O年代末，曾經攜帶著他的太太Hannah來到位於印度錫金的Rumtek道場，主要是為了見第十六世大寶法王噶瑪巴，並跟法王一起讀書。當時我是一位年僅17或18歲的少年，連一句英語都不懂。那個時候我自己也是一名（譯案：譚崔性交的）學生……

每次Ole喇嘛來訪時，他總會告訴我，他從卡盧(Kalu)仁波切[24]和天噶(Tenga)仁波切那裡學來的有關譚崔性交的一切內容實在太美妙了;他說只能用美妙來形容。雖然當時我聽不懂英語，而他還不太會說西藏語，不過我聽得懂一些字像：“dewa chenpo”(「大喜樂」)[25]以及“yabyum” (「男人/女人」);這些字都是 用來形容正在交合中的本尊[26]以及用來代表交合法門時用的。Ole喇嘛講出這些字時，雙手會在胸前交叉，以顯示男女交合的姿勢。他隨後一邊講一邊抱住Hannah在懷裡。就這樣，他把譚崔行為融入了他的嬉皮生活模式。……

的確，Ole喇嘛對譚崔性交的迷戀並不是個特例。大部分對佛教（譯案：藏傳佛教）感興趣的嬉皮們，都真的很喜歡譚崔性交。Ole喇嘛跟他們並沒有不同，只不過他比一般人敢講罷了[27]。紅教的喇嘛們都會盡量把男女交合的法門全部傳授給嬉皮們；當然喇嘛們所教的是根據古老譚崔的傳統，而西方的嬉皮們也了解這個法門能讓他們自己的慾望以及性交習慣，轉化成涵義比較深的性行為。

1980年我去了一趟美國，那是我第一次到西方的國家。當時我總算瞭解金剛乘（譯案：藏傳佛教）在西方國家是很普遍的。我的結論是邱陽‧創巴(Chogyam Trungpa)仁波切和卡盧(Kalu)仁波切是前幾位把譚崔交合的法門引進到西方的喇嘛。我認為邱陽‧創巴(Chogyam Trungpa)仁波切對西方人的哲理如下：西方人的性慾很強，因此生活在性慾的世界裡，於是他斷定了譚崔性交是個適合他們的法門。卡盧(Kalu)仁波切把交合法門傳授給西方人，並告訴他們，這是西藏的傳統，他在西藏時也是以相同的方式傳授給信徒。此外，卡盧(Kalu)仁波切受過很高等的譚崔教育，這兩位偉大的人物在西方很努力的推動譚崔。
________________________________________
[22] 原文為法文資料，詳見附錄二。資料來源：
http://stagestantra17.e-monsite.com/rubrique,le-tantra-dans-le-bouddhisme,1098957.html
[23] Ole喇嘛乃是西方世界中有名的藏傳佛教喇嘛，本書亦節錄一些有關Ole喇嘛的報導，請讀者繼續閱讀即知。
[24] 卡盧(Kalu)仁波切乃是藏傳佛教重要的人物，本書亦節錄有關卡盧(Kalu)仁波切相關的性侵內容，請讀者繼續閱讀即知。
[25] 藏傳佛教譚崔性交就是要透過性交的喜樂說為修行，如達賴喇嘛說：【臍處的明點和性器官頂端的明點具有射出的力量，經由淨化，樂可以轉為不變之大樂，無漏(註：明點精液的不外洩)同時可用在修行道上。】（達賴喇嘛著，丁乃竺譯，《達賴生死書》，天下雜誌股份有限公司，2004年12月20日第一版第十二次印行，頁149。）
[26] 藏傳佛教都把能夠行雙身法的上師、羅剎、夜叉、鬼神稱為「神、佛、菩薩、活佛……等」名字。
[27] 因為譚崔性交就是要與性伴侶來實修，如達賴喇嘛說：【根本心的修行方式是根據：〈一〉新譯派所講的「密集金剛密續」；〈二〉時輪空相法等等；〈三〉寧瑪派的大圓滿法。根據新譯派，修秘密真言到某種程度時，修者修特殊法，如利用性伴侶、打獵等等。雖然利用性伴侶之目的，不難被說成是為了用慾於道及引出較細的證空之識，……只有在這種崇高境界中，才能以悲心將瞋怒用於修道。是故，新譯派的此一修法之基，與大圓滿之基相同。】（第十四世達賴喇嘛講述，《迎向和平》，慧炬出版社出版,達賴喇嘛西藏基金會印贈〈免費結緣〉， 2002/7初版第二刷，頁93-94。）



以上係部分中譯，引用自《喇嘛性世界》第12頁~第15頁之附錄文章
http://www.books.com.tw/exep/prod/booksfile.php?item=0010519359

___________________________________________________________

An Answer by Kunzig Shamar Rinpoche to Questions Raised about Bodhi Path and Lama Ole Nydahl, Criticism of Tantra-Teachings

@ http://marte-micaela-riepe.blogspot.com/2011/10/answer-by-kunzig-shamar-rinpoche-to.html?showComment=1319167450194#c3486312930016202910, Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2011

This letter is my response to two questions that I have been asked by many people. The first question concerns Lama Ole Nydahl. Since Lama Ole frequently explains the connection between Dharma and sex, emphasizing that the bliss of sex is the experience of mind, the question has arisen as to why I continue to support him. The second question is why the Bodhi Path Centers I organized are not Vajrayana. What follows here is a combined answer to both questions.

I believe that most of the people who ask about my support of Lama Ole are quite new to Kagyu Buddhism. Lama Ole came to Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim with his wife Hannah in the late 1960's in order to meet and study with His Holiness the 16th Karmapa. I was a young man then, only 17 or 18 years old, and could not speak any English at all. At that time I was a student myself. In fact most of the Tibetan Lamas in those days could not speak English and there was only one translator at Rumtek at that time, a Bhutanese doctor named Dr. Jigme. At Rumtek, Lama Ole received many teachings from His Holiness the late Karmapa and from Tenga Rinpoche. From time to time he had to go to Darjeeling to get his Sikkim permit renewed and while he was there he studied a lot with Kalu Rinpoche in Sonada.

Whenever Lama Ole visited me, he always talked to me about how wonderful it is that he learned all about tantric union practice from Kalu Rinpoche and Tenga Rinpoche. He thought it was just marvelous. Even though I couldn't understand English and he could not yet speak much Tibetan, I understood words like "dewa chenpo" ("great bliss") and "yabyum" ("male/female", the term for deities in union and union practice), which he would say while crossing his arms in front of his chest in the mudra of union. Then he would hug Hannah at the same time. In that way he combined the hippie lifestyle with tantric conduct.

Lama Ole came to India as a hippie who did everything with wild energy. Although His Holiness the 16th Karmapa advised him to calm down, he never criticized him directly as he was a westerner. Actually Lama Ole's fascination with tantric sex is not exceptional, most of the western hippies who were interested in Buddhism liked it very much. In that respect he is not different from them, he has simply been louder than most about it. Kagyupa Lamas taught hippies the most about yabyum practice. Of course they taught it according to the ancient tantric traditions but western hippies understood it as a practice to turn their sexual desires and habits into meaningful sex.

In 1980 I came to the United States on my first trip to a western country. It was then that I finally learned how Vajrayana is promoted in western countries. I concluded that Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche and Kalu Rinpoche were primarily responsible for introducing tantric union practices to westerners. As far as I understand, Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche's philosophy about westerners is that they are highly motivated by sexual desire, inhabiting a realm of sexual desire. Because of that, he saw Tantra as fit for them. When Kalu Rinpoche taught union practice to westerners, he taught them that it was a Tibetan tradition that he had taught in Tibet in the same way. Indeed, Kalu Rinpoche was really highly trained in tantric teachings. The two of them strongly promoted Tantra in the West and as a result of their efforts tantric practice became a big hit in America, Canada and Europe. As the practice of sexual Tantra had already became popular, once they came to America and Europe the Nyingmapas then developed and expanded it more. After Kagyupa and Nyingmapa Lamas taught westerners about yabyum practice, then Gelukpas began to translate tantric texts and write books about it.

The only difference between Lama Ole and many other western Vajrayana practitioners is that Lama Ole publicly says everything and also encourages his followers to think the same way as he does. A consequence of Tibetan Lamas having taught Vajrayana to westerners in the first place is the view that sex is the heart of Vajrayana practice. My understanding of this can be described as follows: it appears that many western Vajrayana followers have taken sexual Tantra as their path. That path consists of preliminary sex, intermediate sex, excellent sex, and finally supreme sex. I do not mean to say that Lama Ole only teaches about sex. Of course he teaches beneficial practices such as Chenrezik, Phowa, etc.. When he teaches Phowa there are even clear signs that the practice is successful.

Lama Ole was deeply devoted to His Holiness the 16th Karmapa, and that is the basis of his connection with me. It is the continuation of the relationship he, as a Karma Kagyu practitioner, had with the late Karmapa. Nothing more and nothing less. My attitude towards anyone who is a follower of the Karma Kagyu is the same: if someone's attitude is the same as it was during the late Karmapa's time, our attitude is also the same.

This brings me to the subject of the second question. After observing this movement for 30 years, my conclusion is that Vajrayana is not really suitable for most people in both the West and in Asia, including Tibet. You cannot generalize, of course. There are certainly exceptions, but in most cases it is not suitable. Since sex is taught as the main core of tantric practice in the West and this does not benefit anyone, what is generally practiced as Tantra in the West is based on a big misunderstanding.

I have paid close attention to the kinds of qualities required to ensure the suitability of tantric practice for particular people. It depends on the three factors of cause, condition and effect. The cause: people who have some karmic connection to it. Though one may be in a lower human life, some deep karma is the cause of one's connection to Vajrayana practice. The condition: the conditions conducive to tantric practice are, generally, that one belongs to a society that is in nature quite aggressive and one must be filled with emotions. The effect: though one lives in bad conditions, in other words the afflictions are stronger, at the same time one has strong willpower to struggle against hardships. Therefore tantra was very suitable during the middle ages in Asia. For example, it flourished at a time in India when people became more aggressive and suffered from more afflictions. It also remained suitable until around the 14th century in Tibet and the Himalayas.

I think that nowadays the Bodhisattvayana with a high level of meditation is most suitable for the majority of people. That is why I organized Bodhi Path Centers to combine Atisha's Kadampa lineage with Mahamudra meditation in Gampopa's tradition. There are actually two uses of the term Mahamudra within Gampopa's work: one is tantric and the other is his explanation of the meditation that Buddha taught in the Samadhiraja sutra. We see the latter in the titles of texts he wrote about meditation that are based on the Samadhiraja Sutra. When I use the term Mahamudra here, I am referring to the Mahamudra of the Samadhiraja meditation tradition, not to the tantric Mahamudra.

Bodhi Path Centers are established as learning centers. They are places where you can learn Dharma, learn and practice meditation, and continue to lead a normal life. Bodhi Path is not an organization that enforces compulsory rules of behavior. The moral conduct that we encourage is simply the avoidance of the 10 non-virtues: avoid the physical non-virtues of killing, stealing, and sexual misconduct; the verbal non-virtues of lying, slander, harsh speech and divisive speech; and the mental non-virtues of hatred, desire, and ignorance. In addition to that, practitioners should avoid intoxication and blind faith. Keeping these guidelines of moral conduct is your protection, not a set of laws to be followed for their own sake. You should learn what these non-virtues are and learn to avoid them. The Buddhist view of moral conduct is that it will shield you like strong armor.

In addition to avoiding the 10 non-virtuous actions, intoxication and blind faith, you should learn and implement the attitude of a bodhisattva: bodhicitta. This will help you to accumulate vast amounts of merit. Combine this with learning how to meditate according to the teachings on mindfulness and you will achieve the best results.

In the Buddha's time, becoming a monk or a nun meant full renunciation. Monastics renounced everything. They spent their days and nights in meditation, begged for food from villages and towns, and didn't have so much as a penny. It was especially important for them to keep strict discipline since they had to show themselves to be different from ordinary beggars through their conduct. They had to keep their dignity. In all developed countries these days, both in the West and in Asia, becoming a monk or a nun is no longer the only or best possibility to really implement the teachings. One the one hand, where people pay lots of taxes, insurance, etc. it is not practical to live as a monastic; and on the other hand, in the Tibetan tradition monks and nuns do not in any case keep the full vinaya discipline. It's not that it is impossible to become a monk or nun any more, but I think it is unnecessary unless you can keep the discipline of full ordination which means keeping the 253 vows, etc..

The suitability of particular practices and lifestyles is dependent on the era we live in and the nature of the society we live in. Whatever is the most suitable method for transforming people is the highest yana (vehicle). Likewise, what is suitable for fewer people is the middle yana, and what is suitable for very few people is the lowest or so-called hina-yana. All methods for attaining enlightenment were given by the Buddha, but the one most suitable for your development as it is taught to you by a master is the supreme yana. Therefore the curriculum in my Bodhi Path Centers is based on the suitability for people today. While some Vajrayana practice is of course alright, like Chenrezik practice, for example, for the most part I recommend that practitioners concentrate on avoiding the ten non-virtuous actions, keeping the bodhisattva attitude, and learning the levels of mindfulness.

- Shamarpa


Comment: Sharmapa removed the first part of his statement after he was threatened by legal actions through Ole Nydahl. What a wonderful world!